Extend “profession” status to all advisors
Only regulating the title “financial planner” still leaves consumers at risk
- By: Greg Pollock
- March 18, 2016 November 12, 2019
- 09:30
Only regulating the title “financial planner” still leaves consumers at risk
Where are the safeguards to ensure fee-based advisors aren’t collecting a fee for doing nothing?
Gross is not saying that advice shouldn't be paid for; he is only saying that the investment advice that investors receive should be unbiased of…
Editorial
The carve-outs for any proposed best interest standard to avoid adverse market consequences would be extensive and complicated
Editorial
Editorial
Financial advisors should have a regulatory structure similar to those of lawyers, accountants, dentists and other professionals
Clarity for clients makes it easier to shop across carriers
Editorial: Last-minute policy reversals undermine an already fragile trust between tax authorities and the public
CEO Ken Rae sells his stake but stays on as key leader
Why the energy transition still matters
Hint: it has nothing to do with how frequently these investments are priced
We can’t rule out a future change to the capital gains inclusion rate, but Ottawa has reversed course for now
They should alert Canadians anytime someone tries to access their data — immediately
Leverage feels great when things go your client’s way — but a lot of times they don’t
Andrew Kriegler deserves credit for saying what too many prefer to leave unsaid
Guest column: Theories are no match for reality
More in-depth research is needed at the account level to understand the full implications of regulation on advisors' compensation